SAFos.in — Decision intelligence for SAF strategy

The market reality

These are regulatory facts, not projections or vendor claims

The mandates are already law, and they escalate quickly.

ReFuelEU requires 2% SAF today, rising to 6% by 2030 and 20% by 2035, a more than 3x increase in five years.

Non-compliance isn't a reputational risk. It's a financial one.

Shortfalls are penalized at 2x the SAF-jet fuel price gap, per tonne short. A modest gap can turn into a significant financial burden.

SAF still makes up a small fraction of global aviation fuel.

As of 2024, SAF represented just 0.53% of global jet fuel use - underscoring how early-stage and supply-constrained the market remains.

The cost gap between SAF and jet fuel is regulator-acknowledged.

EASA's own reference pricing for ReFuelEU compliance confirms a persistent, substantial price difference between SAF and fossil jet fuel - the same gap non-compliance penalties are calculated from.

What we're building

What SAFos is built to solve

The problems airline teams face today, and how SAFos is designed to address them.

Manually calculating SAF strategy across routes, contracts, regions and timing takes weeks.

By the time an answer is ready, pricing and supply conditions have already moved on. SAFos is built to compress that into minutes, not weeks.

A single rescheduled flight can quietly break an entire SAF uplift plan.

No system today catches it automatically. SAFos recalculates the moment schedules change, keeping strategy current without manual rework.

Four teams, four spreadsheets, no shared truth.

Sustainability, procurement, operations and finance each track their own version of the SAF plan, and rarely see how their decisions affect each other until it's too late. SAFos gives all four teams the same numbers and the same ranked decision, before anyone commits.

Procurement buys the volume. Operations can't always uplift it, and finance can't always deploy the budget behind it.

Purchasing decisions often get made without a clear line of sight into what's physically deployable at each station. So, paid-for SAF doesn't always make it into a wing tank. SAFos is designed to surface these mismatches before the purchase order is signed, not after.

Not every route earns the same compliance credit from the same tonne of SAF.

Depending on distance, fuel burn, and mandate scope, one tonne can do very different work on different routes. A fact most procurement plans don't currently account for. SAFos calculates that route-level value automatically, instead of relying on manual, aggregate analysis.

Contract leverage erodes without a structured view of the data.

Delivery reliability and true cost per tonne often sit in scattered records, not one clear view-leaving procurement to negotiate without the full picture. SAFos structures that data before the next contract cycle, so teams negotiate from a position of strength.

Every SAF decision, optimized